A Review of a Reference List
A Review
of a Reference List
In occasion of writing papers or articles, authors shape
their background literature by referring to preceding work. According to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological
Association (APA, 2010), writers need to
“cite the works of those individuals whose ideas, theories, or research have
directly influenced your work” (p. 169).
By means of
in-text citations and a reference list at the end of their research papers or
articles, authors endow their work with credibility and provide the readers
with the opportunity to refer to the cited literature. Indeed, when the audience is to have access to the references, a set of guidelines such as the
APA manual is to be followed so as to provide the audience with accurate and
sufficient information about the cited works. This paper aims to examine a
reference list in the light of the conventions in the sixth edition of the
Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2010).
As for the layout of the present reference list under inspection
(please, see Appendix) comprises two main errors. First, the title for this
section should have a title named References
centralized, in upper and lower-case letters. Next, the second and any subsequent
line in every reference should be indented, about five spaces or 0.5 inches off
the left margin. As a result of these inaccurate issues, the reference
list fails to comply with academic standards and loses trustworthiness for
publishers and readers alike.
Examining the first item on the list “Blueprint
Lays Out Clear Path for Climate Action." Environmental Defense Fund.
Environmental Defense Fund, 8 May 2007. Web. 24 May 2009” which depicts an
article from an on-line journal, useful information such as the title of the
article, title of the journal, and the date of publication is mentioned though,
it does not to supply the author’s name, volume, issue number, or pages. Similarly,
the article’s title should not be written between quotation marks. An according
reference should be written as follows:
Author, A. A., (Date of publication). Blueprint Lays Out Clear Path for Climate
Action.
Environmental Defense Fund. volume
number (issue number), page numbers. DOI: 00000/00000.
Inspecting the second and third references which portrait
newspaper articles, “ Clinton, Bill. Interview by Andrew C. Revkin. “Clinton on
Climate Change.” New York Times. New York Times, May 2007. Web. 25 May 2009”
and “Dean, Cornelia. "Executive on a Mission: Saving the Planet." New
York Times. New York Times, 22 May 2007. Web. 25 May 2009”, both should have included
the author, the year, month and day of publication. Next, the title of the
article and the title of the newspaper should have been incorporated, along
with the URL for the digital newspaper. The suggested references for these
items should be:
Revkin, A.C. (2007, May 25). Clinton on climate change. The
New York Times.
Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
Dean, C. (2007, May
22). Executive on a mission: saving the planet. The New
York
Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
The present analysis has arrived at the conclusion that
the example reference list encompasses a collection of errors that do not meet
with academic writing standards. Accordingly, the format does not follow
academic conventions, which does not accredit authority to the paper. Likewise,
the reference list leaves aside significant information necessary for readers
to consult the literature.
References:
APA (2010). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association
(6th edition).Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Appendix:
Works Cited
"Blueprint Lays Out Clear Path for Climate Action." Environmental
Defense Fund.Environmental Defense Fund, 8 May 2007. Web. 24 May 2009.
Clinton, Bill. Interview by Andrew C. Revkin. “Clinton on Climate
Change.” New York Times. New York Times, May 2007. Web. 25 May 2009.
Dean, Cornelia. "Executive on a Mission: Saving the Planet."
New York Times. New York Times, 22 May 2007. Web. 25 May 2009.
Comments
Post a Comment